One Last Walk Through Chinatown: Saying Goodbye to My Sony Carl Zeiss 24–70mm f/4

Some gear leaves quietly.

Other pieces deserve a proper send-off.

After a recent photoshoot here in San Francisco, I decided to take a long walk through Chinatown — camera in hand — on what ended up being my last day shooting with the Sony Carl Zeiss 24–70mm f/4.

This wasn’t planned.

It just felt right.

I walked toward the Leica Store San Francisco, passed another downtown camera shop (not exactly the friendliest vibe — but that’s okay), and wandered through streets that have become part of my creative routine since moving to the city.

It felt like closing a chapter.

Leica Storefront in San Francisco

The Lens That Helped Me Start in San Francisco

When I first arrived in SF, this lens was one of my smartest early moves.

I picked up the Sony Carl Zeiss 24–70mm f/4 for $200 on Facebook Marketplace — an absolute steal, and honestly, a huge reason I was able to hit the ground running here.

This lens helped me:

  • Explore the city confidently

  • Shoot real estate, street, and lifestyle work

  • Build momentum in a new market

  • Launch my photography presence in San Francisco

For the price, it punched way above its weight.

And for a while, it was exactly what I needed.

Chinatown in San Francisco

When “Good” Gear Starts Slowing You Down

As my work evolved, though, so did my needs.

Paired with the Sony A7C, the Zeiss 24–70mm f/4 began to show its age — especially when it came to autofocus consistency. Missed focus moments, slower lock-on, and hesitation in fast-moving scenes started to add friction to my workflow.

It wasn’t a bad lens.

It was just… an older one.

And when you’re shooting in a city like San Francisco — with motion, people, unpredictable light, and quick moments — autofocus matters.

A lot.

A Final Walk: Chinatown, Street Frames, and Letting Go

That’s why this walk through Chinatown felt meaningful.

No rush.

No client pressure.

Just documenting textures, storefronts, signs, people, and light — the kind of street photography that made me fall in love with shooting in cities in the first place.

This lens captured:

  • Neon reflections

  • Quiet street corners

  • Passing cars and pedestrians

  • That unmistakable SF energy

And it did so one last time.

The Upgrade I Thought About for Months

This decision wasn’t impulsive.

For months, I debated whether it was time to step into what many photographers consider a true workhorse zoom — the Sony 28–70mm f/2.8 GM I.

It’s not cheap.

Even used, it’s still just over $1,000.

But it’s also:

  • A go-to lens for professionals

  • Known for fast, reliable autofocus

  • Sharp edge-to-edge

  • Built for both photo and video

Eventually, I took the plunge and purchased it used through MPB, which made the upgrade far more manageable.

That lens deserves its own blog post — and trust me, it’s coming.

Why I Chose Sony GM Glass Over Other f/2.8 Options

There’s no shortage of excellent f/2.8 zooms right now — and for a lot of photographers, third-party glass makes total sense. Here’s how I realistically weighed the options before choosing Sony GM.

Sony 28–70mm f/2.8 GM

  • Best-in-class autofocus reliability

  • Seamless Eye AF and subject tracking

  • Designed specifically for Sony bodies

  • Strong performance for both photo and video

This lens is about confidence. It just works — no hesitation, no surprises.

Sigma 24–70mm f/2.8 Art

  • Extremely sharp optics

  • Slightly heavier build

  • AF is good, but not always as consistent in fast-moving scenes

Amazing image quality, but for my shooting style, autofocus consistency mattered more than lab-tested sharpness.

Tamron 28–75mm f/2.8

  • Lightweight and affordable

  • Solid everyday performance

  • AF can feel less predictable in challenging light

Great value, especially for newer shooters — but I wanted something built for long-term, professional use.

The Bottom Line

All three lenses can produce great images.

But when you’re shooting street, real estate, lifestyle, and video in a fast city, reliability matters more than saving a few hundred dollars.

I chose Sony GM because it’s native, predictable, and fully optimized for my camera — and that confidence shows up in the work.

Why This Upgrade Was Inevitable

As my work grows, my gear has to support me — not slow me down.

Between:

  • Real estate shoots

  • Lifestyle content

  • Street photography

  • Video work as a content creator

I needed a lens that could keep up with intention and speed, especially in a city that never really pauses.

The Zeiss f/4 helped me get here.

The GM f/2.8 is helping me move forward.

Both can be true.

Gratitude for the Gear That Got Me Started

I truly appreciate this lens for what it gave me.

It:

  • Opened doors creatively

  • Helped me build confidence in a new city

  • Proved that you don’t need the most expensive gear to make strong work

And that’s something I’ll always stand by.

Sometimes the right gear isn’t about perfection — it’s about timing.

What’s Next

In the next post, I’ll be:

  • Unveiling the Sony 28–70mm f/2.8 GM I

  • Sharing first impressions from real-world shooting

  • Comparing it directly to the Zeiss f/4

  • Breaking down whether the upgrade is actually worth it

If you’re navigating gear upgrades as a photographer or content creator, you’ll want to see that one.





Next
Next

A Bubbly & Boujee Birthday Boudoir in San Francisco